Persistent purchase generic buy alternatives problems anxiety surrounding bedtime and avoidance of sleep-related situations need professional buy cheap diflucan online evaluation. To discover more evidence-based information and resources on the buy pharmacy online science of healthy sleep, visit our dedicated hub. According to diovan prescription the Office on Women's Health, feelings of sadness, known as buy celexa online the baby blues, typically last a few days after birth buy atenolol and occur due to hormonal fluctuations coupled with new challenges. buy amikacin canada Life always has some level of stress, but sometimes, a synthroid sale person may experience events that cause higher levels of stress. purchase generic bentyl prescription delivery According to the National Institute of Mental Health (NAMI), self-care buy atrovent can help a person improve their emotional and mental well-being. purchase glucophage online Emotional lability may present in several ways, such as intense purchase cheapest azor no prescription tablets laughing or crying that may occur either at inappropriate times viagra no prescription or that may be excessive for the present situation. The ampicillin for sale only Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved medication for emotional buy drug sale lability is dextromethorphan (Robitussin, Delsym). Taking a short break from the.

When the FCC landed on Comcast for slowing Bittorrent traffic to a crawl–in essence, discouraging people from watching Internet movies, and steering them to their Comcast Cable TV channels instead–Comcast took the FCC to court. Comcast protested on three grounds, but the basic ground was that the FCC had no authority to tell Comcast to do anything with its Internet service. A panel of three judges has unanimously ruled that Comcast is correct (and therefore didn’t bother with Comcast’s arguments #2 and #3). Public Knowledge has a good explanation of the decision and where it leaves us.

I am disappointed, but I can’t say I am surprised. Congress did not anticipate the Internet when it made telephone regulations, just at it didn’t anticipate the telephone or the radio when it made telegraph regulations. So if there is going to be net neutrality, it appears Congress will have to act. That was on Obama’s campaign agenda, but regulation of anything is not an easy sell in Washington.

Yet it is clear that monopolies are a bad idea, and the business community, except for Verizon, Comcast, and a few other biggies, should support the free flow of bits over the Internet pipes. My previous post is remarkably relevant on this point. Listen to Gardiner Hubbard’s description from 125 years ago of the fate of one small business bullied by the Western Union monopoly:

A few years ago a man started a news bureau in Cincinnati. A correspondent in New-York filed the market reports each morning and the Cincinnati gentleman sold the information to customers. The Western Union asked him to sell out to them and he refused; thereupon his messages were taken away from the “through” wire and sent by a “way” wire. The difference in time was an hour, and the man was ruined. (New York Times, February 8, 1883)

As far as I can see, there is no reason why Comcast couldn’t do exactly the same thing tomorrow. Plus ça change, plus c’est la même chose.

This entry was posted on Tuesday, April 6th, 2010 at 10:02 pm and is filed under The role of government—laws and regulations. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.