Binge low cost viagra eating can link to physical health issues, such as obesity, norvasc discount buy online info diabetes, and high blood pressure, which doctors can also help get bentyl treat and manage. It is possible to become pregnant while vibramycin taking HRT because it does not affect fertility and does buy vibramycin without prescription not work as a contraceptive. Stem cell transplantation has also buy generic tizanidine cost work shown promise as a treatment for some neurological diseases, such viagra drug as multiple sclerosis (MS). If a person experiences a sudden order cheap estrace online worsening of their discomfort or the pain becomes intolerable, they cheap accutane in uk should seek medical attention. There is evidence to suggest that generic ampicillin prescription professional abnormal glutamate levels may play a role in the development clindamycin gel of schizophrenia. However, if the side effects last longer than buy flovent without prescription that, bother you, or become severe, be sure to talk approved 60 pharmacy with your doctor or pharmacist. These can include treating their purchase t-ject 60 online underlying conditions, including PsA itself, as well as comorbid conditions. triamterene online If you have difficulty self-injecting Cyltezo or other concerns about your.

Representatives of photographers have filed suit against Google for digitizing their photos without permission, in the course of scanning books to create the Google Books library. For a long time, the photographers (and several other groups, whom I lump together as “the photographers”) have been annoyed that they aren’t getting any of the revenues from the settlement; they told the court that in no uncertain terms. The Authors and Publishers, in the course of working out their proposed settlement with Google, completely ignored them, and they are now following through on their threat to make trouble.

The interesting thing about this suit is that the complaint is not that the photographers are being deprived of revenues. In fact Google blacks out the copyrighted photos in the digitized books.

The photographers are complaining that the very act of scanning the books creates an illegal copy of the photographs, even if it is never displayed to a Google Books user. Kind of  logical, or would be in a looking glass world.

In its suit, p. 20, the photographers make quite modest demands:

Hmm. $150K per image, times how many images in how many books? You do the math.

James Grimmelmann has a quick analysis of the merits. Whither now the settlement?

This entry was posted on Thursday, April 8th, 2010 at 10:12 pm and is filed under Owning bits—copyright. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.