Health robaxin professional insurance covers medically necessary doctor services in an outpatient hysterectomy order viagra no rx and some doctor services in an inpatient hysterectomy. Medicare Part store get generic without nasonex prescription D plans offer coverage for prescription drugs, and they are purchase azor available to people with original Medicare. Options to care for cheap zithromax overnight delivery the skin with shingles include applying cool compresses, calamine lotion, order tetracycline or topical pain-relieving medication. Traditional medicine uses feverfew as a levitra canada treatment for various conditions, including headaches, fever, and menstrual cramps. t-ject 60 online stores A different treatment, such as medication to block androgen receptors, aldactone no rx may be necessary to shrink the cancer. By discovering this discount prozac no rx mold and recognizing its use, Fleming set the wheels in buying dexamethasone motion to create one of the most useful drugs in purchase clindamycin gel online medical history. The risk of hookworm is low in the cheap prescription without consultation vibramycin order U.S., but people should take care when travelling to holiday destinations.

Representatives of photographers have filed suit against Google for digitizing their photos without permission, in the course of scanning books to create the Google Books library. For a long time, the photographers (and several other groups, whom I lump together as “the photographers”) have been annoyed that they aren’t getting any of the revenues from the settlement; they told the court that in no uncertain terms. The Authors and Publishers, in the course of working out their proposed settlement with Google, completely ignored them, and they are now following through on their threat to make trouble.

The interesting thing about this suit is that the complaint is not that the photographers are being deprived of revenues. In fact Google blacks out the copyrighted photos in the digitized books.

The photographers are complaining that the very act of scanning the books creates an illegal copy of the photographs, even if it is never displayed to a Google Books user. Kind of  logical, or would be in a looking glass world.

In its suit, p. 20, the photographers make quite modest demands:

Hmm. $150K per image, times how many images in how many books? You do the math.

James Grimmelmann has a quick analysis of the merits. Whither now the settlement?

This entry was posted on Thursday, April 8th, 2010 at 10:12 pm and is filed under Owning bits—copyright. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.