Blown To Bits

Data Protection or Wiretaps?

Wednesday, June 11th, 2008 by Ken Ledeen
People cheap viagra internet with obesity, people who have insulin resistance, or diabetes may buy metronidazole gel be at a higher risk for developing sarcopenia. They adjusted buying buy cost for several confounders in their multiple Cox regression analysis, including generic glyburide no prescription jelly cancer history, high blood pressure, age, obesity, and alcohol consumption. buy cheapest low cheap price This research tells us more about the effects of reduced buy ventolin online muscle mass in older people living with diabetes and how real viagra without prescription it can directly influence health and life expectancy." Presuming that buy colchicine the link is true, and potentially causal, it would be glyburide prescription important to see whether increasing muscle mass could reverse some buy discount kenalog of the cardiovascular risk."— — Dr. Faye Riley Diabetes is purchase flovent best price professional a disease with abnormal responses to or inadequate amounts of ampicillin online insulin. However, despite these benefits, outdoor play has declined significantly order without a prescription in Western countries over the past few decades. Whether or cheap cheapest tablets not children have access to outdoor space, caregivers can still levitra for sale encourage them to get similar benefits. Improving posture can help to.

Vontu, Tablus, Code Green, PacketSure, — these are all players in the world of “data security,” of making sure that valuable, confidential, protected, secure data doesn’t leak out. It’s a noble calling. After all, we don’t want our private information leaking everywhere, and corporations, for sure, don’t want theirs sneaking out the back door either.

Here’s what they do. They listen to everything passing through the company network. Often, they sit in a place on the network where information heads out the digital door to the Internet. They are “configurable.” That means that, like much of the software we use, the administrator can set up rules. “If Susan Black sends an email that includes the word ‘Prada’ or ‘Tiffany’ then …” Oh wait, that isn’t exactly the kind of rule you would expect for data security. My point exactly.

The tools that guard against data leaks are nothing more or less than digital wiretaps. The marketing term is “content inspection agents.” I love marketing-speak. The folks in marketing could have just named them “eavesdroppers.” Unlike the wiretaps of old, they don’t require a human listener. They have digital listeners; software that can be configured to detect whatever the administrator might think is suspicious, and then take appropriate action. That action might be as severe as blocking the transmission, or as aparently benign as keeping a copy for administrative review. The tools can look at every form of network traffic, because they operate at the deepest level, inspecting all the bits as they pass by.

Like so many innovations in our digital world, things developed for one purpose can be directed, or mis-directed to another. So it is with these tools. Guarding against data leaks is like protecting the homeland from terrorists. No one would ever argue against it. The question is, which of our assumptions about personal privacy are being sacrificed along the way. Our observation is that, for the most part, we don’t care. The more we know about the world of bits, the more we will come to accept that Big Brother is watching and listening, and we will just have to accept that new reality.

Comments are closed.