Although cheapest tablet there is no cure for schizophrenia, some treatments effectively reduce diclofenac for order a person's symptoms. It shares some symptoms with conditions on buy cheap toradol this spectrum, but it is a different condition from schizophrenia. order prescription This may result in the person avoiding new job opportunities, cheapest generic accutane learning new hobbies, or making friends. If someone has four sale non get or more symptoms of SPD or AvPD, and there is buy cheap asacol online no other explanation for them, they may qualify for a cheapest cipro diagnosis. In contrast, those with SAD may be able to purchase cheapest discount delivery identify an event or experience, such as bullying, that caused no cheap their fear. Comparing schizoid personality disorder (SPD) versus avoidant personality buy cheap bentyl online disorder (AvPD) shows similarities and differences. An individual with paranoid pyrantel pamoate personality disorder may find it difficult to open up and reveal.

A lot of college students are getting “pre-litigation” letters from the Recording Industry Association of America (RIAA) claiming that they have illegally downloaded music. The RIAA threatens them with enormous penalties and offers them the opportunity to settle up for only modestly large fines.

The RIAA identifies these students by their IP addresses — the numerical address of their connection to the Internet. In residential colleges, where students living arrangements are known, the IP address is arguably a reliable identifier of an individual student.

Doubtless many of the RIAA’s claims are accurate. But many are not; we give a particularly dramatic mistake in Blown to Bits.

Now three researchers at the University of Washington have demonstrated ways to spoof IP addresses — that is, to make it look to the RIAA as though a download is going to your IP address when it isn’t, and in fact no download is occurring at all. A new way to be mean to your enemies — induce the RIAA to send threatening letters to them, even though they are completely innocent!

The moral of the paper is that the RIAA’s identification methods are deeply flawed and are unreliable. That could be a very important fact, given the levels to which the RIAA has taken the war over music file sharing.

There is more on the New York Times blog or you can read the original paper here.

This entry was posted on Friday, June 6th, 2008 at 7:53 am and is filed under Owning bits—copyright. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.