They viagra tablet may also feel they have no choice but to steal generic viagra online money and valuables from people around them to pay for get kenalog alternatives store heroin. Yes, an orchiectomy can sometimes help a person develop generic lumigan physical characteristics that people associate with femininity. A doctor should zyprexa online stores individualize the treatment plan by considering the frequency, severity, and lowest price for ventolin triggers of migraine for each person. Pain, fatigue, and muscle buy methotrexate stiffness are all symptoms of fibromyalgia, a long-term condition that buy cheapest cafergot alternative causes aches and pains throughout the body. The SI joint triamterene online sale plays a significant role in the body's mobility, stability, and buy discount toradol without prescription info resistance against shear forces. A functional MRI is a type discount zoloft of imaging that can look at brain activity and determine any.

A year and a half ago I blogged about the case of Steven Warshak, whose email the US government had obtained without a search warrant. At that point the opinion of the court was that no warrant was needed to obtain your email from your ISP. The reasoning was a bit like the original court view of telephone wiretapping–no warrant needed, since after all, what did you think was going to happen to your conversation once it left the confines of your house?

A US court of appeals has now held that the government needs a search warrant to get your email. “Given the fundamental similarities between email and traditional forms of communication,” the court writes, “it would defy common sense to afford emails lesser Fourth Amendment protection.” The court has elected to go with common sense. Bad people do a lot of bad stuff by email, but there is no reason why investigators shouldn’t have to take the same steps to justify their searches they would have to do to open postal mail or listen in on a phone call.

Read the EFF’s announcement, which has a link to the decision.

This entry was posted on Wednesday, December 15th, 2010 at 10:14 am and is filed under Privacy, The role of government—laws and regulations. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.