Privacy in the Boston Globe
Saturday, June 14th, 2008 by Harry Lewis
A purchase cephalexin online meta-analysis is a type of study that looks at the get cheap cialis online effects results of numerous clinical studies to see if there are purchase free (metacam) low price australia any consistent results across the studies. Psychostimulants such as amphetamines buy synthroid without prescription and methylphenidate are the main medications doctors use to treat tizanidine online ADHD. Opdivo for metastatic NSCLCDoctors may prescribe Opdivo for NSCLC best price glucophage that's metastatic (has spread from the lungs to other parts buy generic flagyl side effects of the body). While scientists have not proven the benefits buy quinine alternatives info of cracking the lower back, some people find it brings cheapest methotrexate a feeling of satisfaction and temporary relief from lower back aldactone cheap price pain. Smoking exposes individuals to a combination of harmful chemicals cheap viagra without prescription that cause oxidative stress, inflammation, and vascular damage. WHY ARE COSTS.
I have a piece in the Boston Globe this morning about social networks and other threats to privacy. It’s the most e-mailed.
I didn’t pick or get consulted on the title; that’s generally the rule for these opinion pieces. I’m a bit sorry that it comes out as picking on Facebook, which is merely the most successful and probably no worse on privacy matters than many other sites. As a title for this piece about the privacy wars, I might have chosen instead Pogo’s classic wisdom, “We have met the enemy, and he is us.”