Privacy in the Boston Globe
Saturday, June 14th, 2008 by Harry Lewis
For buy free cafergot no prescription dosage example, a person needing a pain reliever can choose between alesse (ovral l) prescription Tylenol and a generic store-brand version of acetaminophen. Biologics and cheapest cialis online biosimilars can treat conditions such as cancer, multiple sclerosis, and erythromycin online stores other difficult-to-treat conditions. According to the Cancer Action Network, biosimilars serevent sale came onto the market as a more cost effective form betnovate for sale of biologics. As such, the organization notes that doctors often buy cialis us exercise caution when using them due to unknown, potential long-term discount buy side effects. Biologics and biosimilars are effective forms of medication buy buy from us that use living cells and organisms to treat, cure, or buy generic asacol prevent certain conditions. The abnormal amount of thick mucus also glyburide buy drug prevents a person's pancreas from releasing digestive enzymes. Medicare Part buy overnight delivery B covers doctor's visits, diagnostic and laboratory tests, and other outpatient.
I have a piece in the Boston Globe this morning about social networks and other threats to privacy. It’s the most e-mailed.
I didn’t pick or get consulted on the title; that’s generally the rule for these opinion pieces. I’m a bit sorry that it comes out as picking on Facebook, which is merely the most successful and probably no worse on privacy matters than many other sites. As a title for this piece about the privacy wars, I might have chosen instead Pogo’s classic wisdom, “We have met the enemy, and he is us.”