Statins tablet remeron may also cause hepatitis (inflammation of the liver) and pancreatitis generic clomid side effects and alcohol (inflammation of the pancreas). According to the NHPCO, the FAST buy cheap dexamethasone scale outlines seven distinct "stages" of functional decline in AD. methotrexate cheap price There are no high quality studies assessing whether chiropractic is spiriva free delivery a safe or effective treatment for RA. Transgender people may find cheap nasonex be reluctant to receive healthcare because they have concerns about order zofran being unfairly or inappropriately treated. Factors that may affect the purchase amoxicillin online price you'll pay include your treatment plan, your insurance coverage, clomid pharmacy and the pharmacy you use. Pumpkin is rich in fiber gel internet and contains prebiotics, which can help improve digestive system health advair online and bowel movement. As some essential oils are only effective augmentin no prescription for a short time, it is best to reapply these formulations.

The House passed the revised and extended Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, and the Senate is sure to follow suit next week. ArsTechnica has a good explanation of how the bill undercuts constitutional assurances that the government will not spy on its citizens. And also of why the guarantees that really, truly the government will play by the rules now are nothing more than was already present in the previous legislation and ignored by the the Bush administration.

Today’s news (see the Washington Post story) is that Obama will vote for this bill, while promising to watch its application if he becomes president.¬†

One of the things Obama stressed in his primary campaigns was that he voted against the war in Iraq, and that Clinton voted for it. Obama cast himself as the cautious one, the one prepared to say that the president’s say-so for going to war was not enough. Certainly, many who voted for the war did so out of fear that they would seem weak if Saddam Hussein really did have WMD’s; Clinton and others erred on the side of not being seen as risking the security of the nation, and Obama roundly criticized them for having done so.

Here Obama is doing the same thing. His reputation in military and defense matters being open to question because of his inexperience, he is trying to establish himself as a strong defender of national security. He apparently doesn’t need to court the civil libertarian voters, believing they have nowhere else to go.

It doesn’t look like this can be an issue for the debates, since McCain is planning to vote the same way. I wonder what Clinton’s plans are.

 

This entry was posted on Saturday, June 21st, 2008 at 10:24 pm and is filed under Privacy. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.