Blown To Bits

The Candidates on Net Neutrality

Monday, June 23rd, 2008 by Harry Lewis
More buy nasonex online importantly, since doctors rely on a person's report, they must serevent online ask more questions to gain a more comprehensive medical history cheapest diovan of their patient. Telemedicine bridges the exchange of medical information cheap cheap in canada between the doctor and the patient through technology. Doctors use arcoxia various antiviral medications to treat hepatitis C. These drugs attack canadian cipro the virus and can usually cure the disease. Many states order cheapest lipitor no prescription consultation have potentially discriminatory restrictions in place that prevent Medicaid enrollees buy generic t-ject 60 from accessing hepatitis C medications. In the United States, more generic estrace than a third of states have these limits in place buying cheap online so that only hepatologists, gastroenterologists, or infectious disease specialists can purchase methotrexate online prescribe hepatitis C treatment. Although Medicaid might not be able to.

The Wall Street Journal reported Friday that “Sen. Obama is a supporter of legislation that would guarantee ‘network neutrality.'” Sen. McCain reportedly prefers a “market-based” approach, meaning that he opposes neutrality rules. We all love markets, but ask yourself how much a market there is in broadband services where you live. About half the country has zero or one choices, and virtually all the rest at most two, DSL and Cable. Hard for the free market to operate in a monopoly-duopoly world. In the absence of real broadband competition and consumer choice, the service providers have to be regulated to prevent them from using their carrier power to dictate content.

The story reports that Obama has reassembled some of the Clinton telecomm brain trust, including Reed Hundt, who had nice things to say about Blown to Bits. I suppose McCain just asked Cindy? (See the earlier post, McCain and Google.)

Comments are closed.